We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze traffic. In addition, we provide social media, advertising, and analytics partners with information about how you use our website. If you continue to use our website, you agree to our cookies.
Order status

ProgreenPT525 tyre reviews


We gathered since 1999 tyre reviews - we have more than 400,000 test results
and more than 5 billion driven kilometers. Find the best tyre for you.


ProgreenPT525 tyre review

Grip in dry conditions

Braking in dry conditions

Grip in wet conditions

Braking in wet conditions

Grip in snow
 N/A
Driving comfort

Internal noise level

Tyre wear

Fuel consumption

Average based on 1 test results
Ø 14,000 km driven


13.07.2021 from  GK Note  3.05
(14,000 km driven)
  • Grip in dry conditions
  • Braking in dry conditions
  • Grip in wet conditions  N/A
  • Braking in wet conditions
  • Grip in snow
  • Driving comfort
  • Internal noise level
  • Tyre wear
  • Fuel consumption
Tyre size and vehicle make
195 / 60 R15 H
NISSAN Note 1.2
Result: Would you buy again? No way
Comment:
I got rid of these tyres on Week 26 of Year 2021 (2621). My Petlas Progreen PT525 tyres were purchased in Singapore in December 2020. They were manufactured in Week 34 of Year 2020 (3420). In just half a year of usage, covering a distance of 14000km, less than 1 year from manufacturing date, they started developing cracks on the sidewalls, similar to those that you would see only on tyres 5 years or older. Either the rubber was not suitable for Singapore climate resulting in the rubber drying out and "dry rotting", or there was some serious QC deficiency in the manufacturing process. For safety reasons, they have since been replaced and thrown away. Such a shame considering the tyres provided decent grip in dry and wet, though the road noise and comfort were average. Those of you who are running on Petlas, suggest you check the sidewalls for cracks. Will NEVER buy nor recommend Petlas tyres to anyone again in future.